In the event of a change in that stock and the qualification of such a change as a new authorisation for use (in accordance with Article 15 of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/545 of 4 April 2018), the area of use defined in the new authorisation shall remain the same, but only as regards the area where the stock was actually used. The applicant shall demonstrate, at the time of the application for new approval, the area of actual use of the vehicles indicated. This proof may provide data from the National Vehicle Register (NVR), maintenance documents or an agreement with a CEM for the carrying out of maintenance work in the actual operating area, confirmation of the allocation of the line by the infrastructure manager, agreements concluded with railway undertakings on services or the introduction of such vehicles on the lines, but also a statement from a railway company regarding the actual operating area of the infrastructure operating area 1996, 1994, 1994, 1 “Everything seems too good to be true,” Hamayun, a Kabul resident, told Al Jazeera. “I am still questionable and I do not fully trust the three parties to maintain the RIV agreement,” he said. The United States also signed a joint statement with the Afghan government, which achieved a parallel Afghan obligation to combat terrorist groups that threaten the United States and would ensure continued U.S. support to the Afghan government and the provision of military and civilian assistance to achieve mutual security objectives. The Afghan government sought this assurance because it is not a party to the agreement between the United States and the Taliban (at the request of the Taliban) and the joint statement shows that the United States remains a strong partner of the Afghan constitutional government. “We are preparing to sign (the agreement) on February 29,” U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a statement early Friday.

“Inter-Afghan negotiations will begin soon after and build on this fundamental step to achieve a comprehensive and lasting ceasefire and the future political roadmap for Afghanistan.” Issues relating to Afghanistan`s political future are not addressed in the agreement between the United States and the Taliban, including the maintenance of a democratic system of government and respect for fundamental rights and freedoms. The agreement states that the Taliban`s obligations “will apply until the formation of the new Afghan Islamic government after the settlement, as determined by the inter-Sudanese dialogue.” The form of this government is in fact the subject of international negotiations and not of an agreement between a foreign government and an unrectified insurgent group. .