You may only use the original (as anyone receives it from you) under the conditions set out in the license, at least as a general courtesy that you must communicate under these terms. This section is an incomplete but growing list of licenses and confirmations for third-party software included in the Python distribution. GPL compatible does not mean that we distribute Python under the GPL. All Python licenses, unlike the GPL, allow you to distribute a modified version without making your open source changes. GPL-compatible licenses allow you to combine Python with other software released under the GPL; Not the others. In 2000, Python was briefly released under the Python license, which is not compatible with the GPL. This incompatibility with the Free Software Foundation is explained by the fact that “this Python license is subject to the laws of the State of Virginia in the United States”, which the GPL does not allow. [2] Reading copyright through the Free Software Foundation, the creation of a derivative class creates a derivative work of the original work, and the license should therefore be included. This definition is not universally accepted. I want to fulfill the license requirements of this code, it`s the PSF LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR PYTHON 2.7.6, which says (in part) that I understand that you feel like the license in your repo doesn`t seem to be in your place.

I wouldn`t worry too much about that. Just paste it and clearly indicate what it applies to. . PSF thus grants the licensee one. License to. Python 2.7.6 for use alone or in a derivative version, provided however that the PSF License Agreement and the PSF Copyright Notice, i.e. “Copyright © 2001-2014 Python Software Foundation; All rights reserved” are kept in Python 2.7.6 alone or in a derivative version created by the licensee Personally, I am a fan of a central file that provides you with copyright information and several separate license files as needed. Take a look at the combination of code written under different licenses (Eiffel Forum License, MIT and Apache), what are my options? The C14N 2.0 test suite in the test pack (Lib/test/xmltestdata/c14n-20/) was viewed on the W3C website under www.w3.org/TR/xml-c14n2-testcases/ and distributed under the BSD 3-Clause license: if the work contains a “NOTICE” text file as part of its distribution, all derivative works you distribute must contain a legible copy of the package leaflet. with the exception of those which do not concern part of the derivative works, at least one of the following points: in a NOTICE text file distributed as part of the derivative works; within the source form or documentation, where provided at the same time as the derivative works; or in a display generated by derivative works, if and where such indications of third parties normally appear. . .

.